Ignition map tuning

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Post Reply
Patrick McHugh
Posts: 4163
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Ignition map tuning

Post by Patrick McHugh »

Does anyone have any advice / recommended reading for tuning an ignition map?

I have come to find that tuning the AFR's are a piece of cake compared to ignition and i'm convinced there's a lot of power missing from my car because of an ignition map that's too conservative.

I have access to a dyno, which i've heard makes tuning ignition much easier but I want to have my act together when I go.

Image
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

I would say there is room for more timing on boost. Start with 2 degrees at a time.
Patrick McHugh
Posts: 4163
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by Patrick McHugh »

T_C_D wrote:I would say there is room for more timing on boost. Start with 2 degrees at a time.
How about off boost? Should I just find a stock map and match that?
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

Patrick McHugh wrote:
T_C_D wrote:I would say there is room for more timing on boost. Start with 2 degrees at a time.
How about off boost? Should I just find a stock map and match that?
Peter will have an excellent off boost map.
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

I'm running 16 degrees at 200 kpa, 13 at 230 and 9.5 at 260. Car doesn't exceed 1.45 bar on high boost.

I would add in a ton of advance at lower RPM too. You don't have to worry about detonation until it starts to get into the powerband, and you can use relatively aggressive ignition advance to help boost low-mid torque.
Patrick McHugh
Posts: 4163
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by Patrick McHugh »

T_C_D wrote:
Patrick McHugh wrote:
T_C_D wrote:I would say there is room for more timing on boost. Start with 2 degrees at a time.
How about off boost? Should I just find a stock map and match that?
Peter will have an excellent off boost map.
That's what I started with, the map he has is from a car with a different cam thought and it just didn't feel right.
Patrick McHugh
Posts: 4163
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by Patrick McHugh »

turbodan wrote:I'm running 16 degrees at 200 kpa, 13 at 230 and 9.5 at 260. Car doesn't exceed 1.45 bar on high boost.

I would add in a ton of advance at lower RPM too. You don't have to worry about detonation until it starts to get into the powerband, and you can use relatively aggressive ignition advance to help boost low-mid torque.
Is the M30 pretty similar to the M20 in regards to timing?
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

Similar. The B34 seems to like a little more, so my M20 map would be on the conservative side.
Patrick McHugh
Posts: 4163
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by Patrick McHugh »

turbodan wrote:Similar. The B34 seems to like a little more, so my M20 map would be on the conservative side.
I may be running a modified version of your map right now, would you mind sending it to me so I can compare?

patrickmchugh23@gmail.com

Or just attach an image.
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

Image
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

I think the advance might be a little aggressive under 100 kpa but its close. I also have another table for bins below 50 kpa, it doesn't just stop there.
clongo
Posts: 1050
Joined: Nov 21, 2009 10:58 PM
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post by clongo »

Patrick, if I have time today I will send you my ignition map.
Patrick McHugh
Posts: 4163
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by Patrick McHugh »

Dan,

I loaded the map today, it feels better than what I had! Thanks
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

I looked at a bunch of maps today and I felt that I was running too much advance at very low RPM. I don't run in that area of the map except when blipping the throttle, but if you like to lug the engine around something like this might work better. Seemed to feel better to me while I was tuning accel enrichments.

Image
Patrick McHugh
Posts: 4163
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by Patrick McHugh »

turbodan wrote:I looked at a bunch of maps today and I felt that I was running too much advance at very low RPM. I don't run in that area of the map except when blipping the throttle, but if you like to lug the engine around something like this might work better. Seemed to feel better to me while I was tuning accel enrichments.

Image
Cool, thanks! That's my next task, there's a bit of a delay when I hit the throttle quickly, almost as if the accell pump isn't working on a carbed car. I've fooled with the enrichment wizard a bit but it hasn't made a difference.
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

I wish we could get an eddy current adapter for the dynojet at my work. You can see the torque at given load points without recording a run, it would be the ultimate way to tune the map. The whole map.
Duke
Posts: 9986
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Ormond Beach, FL

Post by Duke »

Scottinva wrote:I wish we could get an eddy current adapter for the dynojet at my work. You can see the torque at given load points without recording a run, it would be the ultimate way to tune the map. The whole map.
You need lots of road an a helper to drive the car and hold it at various power profiles as you tune on the computer.
T_C_D
Posts: 7733
Joined: May 27, 2009 11:42 AM
Location: Twin Cities
Contact:

Post by T_C_D »

This is the map from the green e34 than ran freakin great. It was a 8.0CR B35. Max boost level was 200kpa. I am surprised the timing is low.

Edit: I just reviewed a datalog from the dragstrip and the timing was +2 degrees across the board at 200kpa. 6954rpm in 1st gear. :shock:

Image
ianwood
Posts: 195
Joined: Jun 13, 2008 2:50 AM
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by ianwood »

Turbodan, did you ever figure out good EAE settings or are you using the less complicated enrichment?
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

ianwood wrote:Turbodan, did you ever figure out good EAE settings or are you using the less complicated enrichment?
I took another shot at it recently. I like the way its working but its not quite perfect. I'll post what I've got later on if you want to try it out. Regular TPS based AE just plain sucks until the engine is warmed up. EAE has tremendous potential there. I'm going to keep working on it. The more I mess with it the better I understand how to make effective adjustments.
ianwood
Posts: 195
Joined: Jun 13, 2008 2:50 AM
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by ianwood »

turbodan wrote:
ianwood wrote:Turbodan, did you ever figure out good EAE settings or are you using the less complicated enrichment?
I took another shot at it recently. I like the way its working but its not quite perfect. I'll post what I've got later on if you want to try it out. Regular TPS based AE just plain sucks until the engine is warmed up. EAE has tremendous potential there. I'm going to keep working on it. The more I mess with it the better I understand how to make effective adjustments.
Yes, please do share. I actually kept the EAE on the turbo eta after playing with it a bit. It had issues but was still better than regular AE especially on the track. Working on a new build turbo seta stroker for another E28 track car. Details soon.
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

The tuning laptop took a dump the other night. I think I will have to reinstall the OS. The tune is still intact on the MS ECU, but I will have a bit of work to do before I can connect to it again.

I will get back to you on the EAE.
Post Reply