My turbo project.

Discussion pertaining to positive pressure E28s.
Shadow
Posts: 951
Joined: Dec 28, 2008 10:03 PM
Location: USA

Post by Shadow »

That tube on the m20 is a vent for blow-by gasses.
It runs from the block to the head. The manifold is just used
as a flange so it can connect to the head.

M30s have huge oil drains and a huge area for crank ventilation.

If you can see vapor pouring out at idle it needs some new rings. :banana:
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

Shadow wrote:That tube on the m20 is a vent for blow-by gasses.
It runs from the block to the head. The manifold is just used
as a flange so it can connect to the head.

M30s have huge oil drains and a huge area for crank ventilation.

If you can see vapor pouring out at idle it needs some new rings. :banana:
No vapors at idle but after a good run there is oil seeping out of the aux air valve bolts on the valve cover. The valve cover is filling with oil.
This is also an issue on some small block Fords
Paul Burke has explained this issue. We installed restrictors on E12 turbo and it worked perfectly.
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

turbodan wrote:How do you know you're not blowing oil because of worn rings? Thats generally what excessive oil loss through the breather means, especially on the street. If you're getting more than vapors theres a problem in the bottom end. BTDT. Assuming this is due to "overoiling" seems to be simplistic and likely incorrect. You're not giving BMW much credit, and they don't (or didn't) fuck around when it comes to building a motor.

But hey, its your motor. Let me know how the top end holds up.
Its not driving normal, its most of these cars people don't push them hard enough grip wise. My engine is pretty healthy for its mileage. Driving normal its perfect, it's when you push it in the turns. It's like the gforces are great enough to not allow the oil in the head to drain back properly. If I drive normal there is no problem, I just meant I can get enough grip on the street to have it filling up the valve cover. I'm suprised you are first hearing of this now, i've seen multiple builds with this. Maybe Paul Burke will chime in.

Your right they don't mess around, and i'm not saying this is a fault in design per say. It's just i'm taking an n/a engine made for lugging around. Then beating the piss out of it on hard turns with a turbo attached. That wasn't in the design.
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

I'd much rather implement an effective oil recovery system than restrict oil flow. Thats my .02. The oiling system is already barely sufficient for the top end as is. Restricting oil flow may solve one problem but you dont want to trade off engine life or reliability in doing so.
Bill in MN
Posts: 1718
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: The Boonies, Mn
Contact:

Post by Bill in MN »

I did not have restrictors.

My motor spends the majority of its time over 4k and there is evidence of oil starvation in some of the rod bearings. I run a crank scraper and additional baffles so 2 guesses as to where the oil is.

Ditto on the fact that these motors were not designed to run lots of R's on a consistant basis.
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

Bill in MN wrote:I did not have restrictors.

My motor spends the majority of its time over 4k and there is evidence of oil starvation in some of the rod bearings. I run a crank scraper and additional baffles so 2 guesses as to where the oil is.

Ditto on the fact that these motors were not designed to run lots of R's on a consistant basis.
This is why I went to the restrictor, to allow more oil at the rod bearings, and the turbo. The head seems to be over-oiled.
paul burke
Posts: 844
Joined: Sep 08, 2008 4:51 PM
Contact:

Post by paul burke »

Just a note that may change some of the thinking here.

S38 and S14 engines have always used factory installed deck restrictors and they are much smaller than what we are using in the m30s.

All four cylinder (M10) road race engines leave my shop with a .070 :shock: restrictor in place.


Paul
mooseheadm5
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 23035
Joined: Apr 08, 2009 10:30 PM
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Contact:

Post by mooseheadm5 »

paul burke wrote:Just a note that may change some of the thinking here.

S38 and S14 engines have always used factory installed deck restrictors and they are much smaller than what we are using in the m30s.

All four cylinder (M10) road race engines leave my shop with a .070 :shock: restrictor in place.


Paul
Do you use better rockers, though?
Shadow
Posts: 951
Joined: Dec 28, 2008 10:03 PM
Location: USA

Post by Shadow »

paul burke wrote:Just a note that may change some of the thinking here.

S38 and S14 engines have always used factory installed deck restrictors and they are much smaller than what we are using in the m30s.

All four cylinder (M10) road race engines leave my shop with a .070 :shock: restrictor in place.


Paul
Hello Paul.
Where exactly is this restrictor and what size do you recommend for the m30?

Is this something everyone should do just like clamping the
cam oiler bar?
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

Shadow wrote:
paul burke wrote:Just a note that may change some of the thinking here.

S38 and S14 engines have always used factory installed deck restrictors and they are much smaller than what we are using in the m30s.

All four cylinder (M10) road race engines leave my shop with a .070 :shock: restrictor in place.


Paul
Hello Paul.
Where exactly is this restrictor and what size do you recommend for the m30?

Is this something everyone should do just like clamping the
cam oiler bar?
There are 2 oil galleys in the block next to head bolts. The head gasket has egg shaped copper rings around the galley and the bolt hole.
I think 5/16 threaded brass plug with .110 hole it is what the machine shop used. Same shop is doing Scott's engine
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

turbodan wrote:I wouldn't go there unless it was certainly necessary. The M30 isn't a motor I'd run around a track at redline any period of time anyway. Its much more efficient at making midrange power.

Restrictors are effective all the time, so you're getting less oil at idle and everywhere else too. For these motors that presents a problem. The oil spray bar requires a certain volume of oil to function at all. I'd explore improving oil drainage, installing baffling or even a catch can or oil recovery system before I restricted oil supply to the head. That should be a last resort if engine life is going to be a concern.
At idle the oil flow from the pump is so low, it doesn't even "see" the restriction. Idle is where M30 cams need help.
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

Shadow wrote:
paul burke wrote:Just a note that may change some of the thinking here.

S38 and S14 engines have always used factory installed deck restrictors and they are much smaller than what we are using in the m30s.

All four cylinder (M10) road race engines leave my shop with a .070 :shock: restrictor in place.


Paul
Hello Paul.
Where exactly is this restrictor and what size do you recommend for the m30?

Is this something everyone should do just like clamping the
cam oiler bar?
Clamping the oil bar is too late in the system to have a real affect.
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

Scottinva wrote:
Clamping the oil bar is too late in the system to have a real affect.
I think it does help keep #1 cam lobe better lubed at low rpm
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

Image

Started bolting on MISC things, and making sure I still had all the hardware I needed. I ordered all the bearings and seals and a huge amount of parts should be here around wednesday, than I can actually start putting in some of the major parts.
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

Scottinva wrote:Image

Started bolting on MISC things, and making sure I still had all the hardware I needed. I ordered all the bearings and seals and a huge amount of parts should be here around wednesday, than I can actually start putting in some of the major parts.
I have a set of standard size bearing and gasket set
tacomagabe
Posts: 46
Joined: Feb 16, 2009 9:56 PM

Post by tacomagabe »

Do you have a picture of the restrictors you could post while you have the head off? This is the first I've heard of this too. Makes sense too me though.
Murfinator
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sep 07, 2007 1:39 AM
Location: ZION - 84032

Post by Murfinator »

tacomagabe wrote:Do you have a picture of the restrictors you could post while you have the head off? This is the first I've heard of this too. Makes sense too me though.
Image
Image

In the first photo you can see the oil restrictor. In the second photo is part of the justification for the restrictor: blueprinted oil pump with silicon bronze pressure relief valve bushing and smaller E32 sprocket. This pump would only exacerbate the over-oiling of the head without restrictors in place. Finally, when a professional with 30+ years building these motors tells me I need to install restrictors I take heed and do as instructed.
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

Murfinator wrote: This pump would only exacerbate the over-oiling of the head without restrictors in place. Finally, when a professional with 30+ years building these motors tells me I need to install restrictors I take heed and do as instructed.
lest you do this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbqP6TgK8Eo
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

Brought the head to work and cleaned it, will take it apart and do a valve job and replace all the seals and what not while i'm in there. I plan to replace the valve springs for job security as well. Image
Image

I acid dipped the oil pump, and went through that and got it all bolted on. I am going to grab some chain from work to make a new oil pump chain and shim the pump to change the chain tension if needed. I went through the coolant pump and checked everything and just through that on as well. I need to figure out where i'm going to tap the oil filter housing for turbo feed, and figure out how the engine mounts are different (came from 7 series.)
altus22
Posts: 621
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Norfolk, VA

Post by altus22 »

Why don't you use a stock chain? You're going to replace the oil pump gears with new ones too, right? If you don't, you'll wear your new chain more quickly.
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

I can make it for free, and no the sprockets aren't worn. I don't feel like paying 40 dollars for oem chain. This is a budget build. Buying all new sprockets would be very pricey and would be a waste of money IMO unless your sprockets were worn out. Just the cam sprocket is over 50 bucks.
FirstFives Dictator
Posts: 849
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by FirstFives Dictator »

Scottinva wrote:I can make it for free, and no the sprockets aren't worn. I don't feel like paying 40 dollars for oem chain. This is a budget build. Buying all new sprockets would be very pricey and would be a waste of money IMO unless your sprockets were worn out. Just the cam sprocket is over 50 bucks.
:facepalm:
wkohler
Posts: 50924
Joined: Oct 05, 2006 11:04 PM
Location: Phönix, Arizona, USA
Contact:

Post by wkohler »

HOLY CRAP?! $50? WOW. Better not buy that new. :roll:
turbodan
Posts: 9217
Joined: Jan 09, 2007 10:19 PM

Post by turbodan »

When it comes to the handful of parts that will cause catastrophic damage if they fail you can't justify the expense?

What? And people think I'm a hack.
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

wkohler wrote:HOLY CRAP?! $50? WOW. Better not buy that new. :roll:
it's 120. I'm just trying to save money, but I guess this isn't the place place to save some.
Last edited by Scottinva on Dec 28, 2011 12:53 AM, edited 2 times in total.
wkohler
Posts: 50924
Joined: Oct 05, 2006 11:04 PM
Location: Phönix, Arizona, USA
Contact:

Post by wkohler »

Scottinva wrote:
wkohler wrote:HOLY CRAP?! $50? WOW. Better not buy that new. :roll:
it's 120. Say what you guys want. If it's not worn out i'm not replacing it. I'm putting on new chains and and guide rails. What part of an engine if it fails wouldn't cause catastrophic damage?
It's less than a stock headgasket kit...
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

I guess it would be a good idea to replace the sprockets since I am replacing the chain. I will replace them, it does make since to do it now.
Murfinator
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sep 07, 2007 1:39 AM
Location: ZION - 84032

Post by Murfinator »

I have an extra new IWIS timing chain I'll sell for $25 which is $10 less than retail. Hate to see you put the engine back together with old, worn parts. Do it right the first time. Please.
Scottinva
Posts: 3663
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Location: Norfolk, Virginia

Post by Scottinva »

No worries new parts are already on the way. Thanks though. I plan to do a 3 angle type job on the valves, talking to some of the machinists it doesn't seem like porting is really going to be worth my while. I did the intake manifold and gasket matched it and what not. However I dont want to dive into the head and start sacrificing low end. It appears BMW did a superb job anyway.Also no more drunk posting for me.
altus22
Posts: 621
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Norfolk, VA

Post by altus22 »

I'm glad you bought new. The 4 parts that you weren't going to buy new came up at $100 on BavAuto.

You're still going to grind your valves at least, right?
Post Reply